Business

AI Content disclaimer and umbrella/sister website advice

Adam

06 Jan 2026 • 6 min read

I want to put in a disclaimer in the footer of our website basically saying AI can make mistakes and whatever else you think we should say in the footer as a basic informational disclaimer. please write it

ChatGPT 5.2 said:
Here are a few solid footer disclaimer options (pick one). They’re written to be short enough for a footer, but still cover the important bases: AI can be wrong, not professional advice, use your judgment, and liability limits.

Option A (clean + general, best default)

Disclaimer: Content on this site may be generated with the help of AI and may contain errors or omissions. It’s provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not professional advice. Verify important details independently and use your own judgment. Use of this site is at your own risk.

Option B (extra clear, slightly more legal)

Disclaimer: Some content on this site is created or assisted by artificial intelligence. AI output can be inaccurate, outdated, or incomplete. Nothing on this site constitutes legal, medical, financial, or professional advice. We make no warranties and accept no liability for actions taken based on this content. Always verify critical information from primary sources.

Option C (short + punchy)

AI Disclaimer: AI can make mistakes. This site is for informational purposes only—not professional advice. Double-check important details before acting.

Option D (friendly tone)

Heads up: We sometimes use AI to help generate or summarize content. While we aim for accuracy, mistakes happen. Treat this site as information—not advice—and verify anything important before you rely on it.

If you tell me which site this is for (MyConversationsWithAI vs SportsAspects), I can tailor one line to match the vibe (e.g., add “not betting advice” for SportsAspects).

You said:
This is for MyConversationsWithAI. I'm in the process of editing the footer code that you gave me for SportsAspects to meet the needs of MyConversationsWithAI also, on a separate subject I'm thinking of making SportsAspects a sister site of MyConversationsWithAI, or under that umbrella. But I have not decided on that yet. If they are sister sites, then they will link to eachother in the footer

ChatGPT 5.2 said:
Got it. For MyConversationsWithAI, I’d keep the footer disclaimer focused on: AI fallibility, informational-only, user responsibility, and “views belong to the authors,” since you’ll have public submissions.

Here are 3 strong footer-ready versions (choose one):

Best default (balanced + clean)

Disclaimer: Some content on this site is created or assisted by AI and may be inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated. Posts reflect the views of their authors and are provided for informational and educational purposes only—not professional advice. Verify important details independently. Use of this site is at your own risk.

Shorter (still safe)

Disclaimer: AI-assisted content may contain mistakes. Posts are for informational purposes only and do not constitute professional advice. Please verify important information. Use at your own risk.

More protective (strongest legal tone)

Disclaimer: Content on this site may be created or assisted by AI and may contain errors. User-submitted posts reflect the views of their authors. Nothing on this site is legal, medical, financial, or professional advice. We make no warranties and disclaim liability for actions taken based on this content. Verify critical information from primary sources.

If SportsAspects becomes a sister site

Footer linking is totally fine. Just keep it simple and avoid making it look like one site “endorses” the other’s claims. A clean pattern is:

“Sister site: SportsAspects.com” (or “Projects: …”)
Put it near the disclaimer, not mixed into it.

Example footer line:
Sister site: SportsAspects.com — sports astrology & chart breakdowns.

If you paste your current footer HTML snippet (even just the relevant section), I’ll drop the disclaimer in cleanly and make sure the layout doesn’t wrap ugly like it did before.

and whats your thoughts on the strategy of making them sister sites?

Making them sister sites can be a strong move — if you keep the roles clean and don’t dilute either brand.

Why it’s strategically smart

Trust + legitimacy transfers. MCWAI is a “platform/dataset/library” vibe. SportsAspects is a “vertical application” of AI + analysis. When you link them as siblings, SportsAspects looks less like a random niche blog and more like part of a real ecosystem.
SEO + discovery loop. People land on SportsAspects from search/social, then discover MCWAI (“oh this is bigger than just sports”). People land on MCWAI from AI/conversation searches and then discover SportsAspects as a “cool use case.” That cross-pollination is valuable.
Clear monetization separation. MCWAI can stay broad + community-driven; SportsAspects can be the paid product lane. “Umbrella ecosystem, different missions” is a classic play.
Content leverage. You can turn SportsAspects methodology/behind-the-scenes into occasional MCWAI posts (“How we generate the charts,” “workflow,” “prompting,” etc.) without turning MCWAI into a sports site.

The main risk

Brand contamination / confusion. If a casual visitor can’t immediately tell what each site is for, you lose conversions. Worst case: MCWAI starts feeling like “just a sports thing,” or SportsAspects feels like “just a side project.”

The rule that keeps it clean

Treat MCWAI as the platform / archive / public library, and SportsAspects as a product / niche publication.

If you do sister linking, keep the messaging tight:

On MCWAI: “Sister site: SportsAspects.com (sports astrology analysis)”
On SportsAspects: “Powered by the MCWAI ecosystem” or “Part of the MyConversationsWithAI network” (light touch, no big banner)

What I’d do if it were my project

Yes, make them sister sites, but keep it subtle at first:
- Add a small footer link both ways.
- Add a “Network” or “Projects” page later if the ecosystem grows.
Avoid heavy cross-posting. Link when it’s actually relevant.
Use a consistent “network” label (same wording both sites) so it feels intentional.

Practical setup recommendation

Footer section title: Projects or Network (better than “sister sites” wording)
One-line description per link so it’s not just random domains:
- MyConversationsWithAI — public AI conversation library
- SportsAspects — sports astrology previews & chart breakdowns

If you want, paste your current footer menu layout (the HTML/partials snippet) and I’ll show you exactly how to place a “Network” block that looks clean on desktop and doesn’t wrap weird on mobile.

You said:
ok, I like your take on this. I'll show you the footer when I roll it out. but now I'm wondering, if I should do the following on SportsAspects basically show how the site was built. basically post our conversations about what we were doing with leagues, chartgen, tags, and our conversations about predictive astrology concepts on SportsAspects instead of MyConversationsWithAI what do you think about that idea?

ChatGPT 5.2 said:
That idea is good — but only if you separate “builder/devlog content” from “game picks / charts” so SportsAspects doesn’t turn into a messy blend.

Why putting the build story on SportsAspects can work

It strengthens authority. Showing how you built ChartGen, your tagging system, your workflow, your methodology — that makes SportsAspects feel real and serious, not “vibes astrology blog.”
It’s perfect evergreen SEO. “How to generate astrology charts for games,” “dominants explained,” “sports astrology workflow,” “how we structure tags/weeks/hubs,” etc. Those posts can rank for months/years.
It converts the right audience. The people who care about how you do it are often the ones who become subscribers, power users, or promoters.

The risk (and it’s real)

If you dump raw MCWAI-style conversation transcripts into SportsAspects, you’ll:

confuse casual sports readers,
clutter your home page / feed,
and dilute the “this is here to help me with games” vibe.

So the move is: SportsAspects gets curated “Build / Method” posts, not raw transcript dumps.

Keep raw conversations on MyConversationsWithAI.
Publish curated, readable “behind the build” articles on SportsAspects that link back to the raw conversation on MCWAI.

That gives you:

MCWAI = archive + transparency + dataset
SportsAspects = polished authority + subscriber-friendly content + SEO

How to structure it on SportsAspects so it stays clean

Create a section/category like:

Method
Lab Notes
Build Log
How It Works
ChartGen Devlog

Then follow a consistent post pattern:

Post template idea

What we were trying to solve (problem)
The approach (system design)
The implementation (scripts/workflow)
What changed (v1 → v2)
Screenshots / charts
“Full conversation transcript” link → points to MCWAI

What content belongs where

SportsAspects:

Explanations of chart reading, dominants, tagging strategy, hub pages
“Why we track TOB” methodology
“How our NFL Week hubs work”
ChartGen changelogs + feature demos
Predictive astrology concepts explained in sports terms

MCWAI:

Raw full transcripts (long, messy, exploratory)
Broader AI experimentation not sports-specific
Any conversation that isn’t polished or is repetitive

One clean rule

If it helps a SportsAspects reader win/understand games or trust the method → SportsAspects.
If it’s primarily “documentation of our chat” → MCWAI.

If you want, I can propose a simple taxonomy (tags + menu) for SportsAspects so “Method/Lab” content never competes with game previews on the homepage.